Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Thomas French v. Peter Bludworth, et al
as 23-35296
Petitioner / Appellant: THOMAS WILLIAM FRENCH
Respondent / Appellee: PETER BLUDWORTH and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF MONTANA
Richey v. Katoa et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv00050
Plaintiff: Thomas William Sinclair Richey
Defendant: Sergeant Katoa and B Duncan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richey v. Duncan We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv00018
Plaintiff: Thomas William Sinclair Richey
Defendant: Duncan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
French v. Bludworth et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 9:2022cv00169
Petitioner: Thomas William French
Respondent: Peter Bludworth and Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cornelius v. USA
as 6:2019cv00131
Petitioner: Thomas William Cornelius, Jr
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Cornelius v. USA
as 6:2019cv00139
Petitioner: Thomas William Cornelius, Jr
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
USA v. Thomas Cornelius, Jr. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 18-35733
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: THOMAS WILLIAM CORNELIUS, Jr.
Godwin v. Shartle et al
as 4:2016cv00455
Plaintiff: Roger Dale Godwin
Defendant: JT Shartle, A Cristinzio, Unknown Van Deuender and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cornelius v. USA
as 3:2016cv01149
Petitioner: Thomas William Cornelius, Jr
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Barquero v. Obama et al
as 3:2016cv01293
Plaintiff: Amilcar Barquero
Defendant: Barack Obama, Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Eric H. Holder , Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?