Cases 121 - 130 of 140
Smith v. Hill
as 3:2009cv01020
Petitioner:
Michael Smith
Respondent:
Jill Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Taylor v. Smith et al
as 3:2009cv03009
Plaintiff:
Keith Desmond Taylor
Defendant:
Michael Smith, Unknown Officer, Gregory P. Novack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Smithet al v. Ticketmaster Entertainment, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv04634
Plaintiff:
Michael Smith and ISA MACCUTCHEON
Defendant:
TicketMaster Entertainment, Inc. and TICKETSNOW
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Type:
Torts - Property
USA v. Ian Smith
as 09-10261
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
IAN MICHAEL SMITH
Michael Smith v. County of Riverside et al
as 5:2009cv00901
Plaintiff:
Michael Smith
Defendant:
County of Riverside, County of Riverside, Riverside County Sheriffs Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
USA v. Jemara Butler
as 09-10067
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JEMARA AKIL BUTLER, AKA Michael Smith, AKA Brian Williams
Chavez v. La Paz County, Arizona et al
as 2:2008cv02066
Plaintiff:
Russell W. Chavez
Defendant:
La Paz County, Arizona, Michael Burke, Richard Weiss and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Smith v. Stovall et al
as 2:2008cv02492
Plaintiff:
Michael Smith
Defendant:
R. Stovall, K. Lawrence, S. Hawkness and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 08-15312
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Shaw et al v. Asotin County et al
as 2:2007cv00375
Plaintiff:
Jay Shaw, Jay Shaw, Estate of Tyler M Shaw and others
Defendant:
Asotin County, Asotin County Sheriff's Office, Wayne Weber and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
