Cases 11 - 20 of 32
Williams v. Municipality of Anchorage et al
as 3:2020cv00304
Defendant:
Crystal Kennedy, Dean Gates, Kate Vogel and others
Plaintiff:
Nial Sherwood Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Constant v. Southern California Edison Com
as 20-56179
Defendant / Appellee:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES CONSTANT
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv07364
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
James Constant v. Southern California Edison Co.
as 2:2020cv06700
Defendant:
Southern California Edison Co.
Plaintiff:
James Constant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Mendoza v. California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation et al
as 1:2019cv01713
Defendant:
Stu Sherman, A. Shaw, David Constante and others
Plaintiff:
Jorge Mendoza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Eighteen Karat Club et al
as 2:2019mc00087
Defendant:
R. L. Frick, James G. Donavan, Shreve & Company and others
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, and United States of America
Kretzer v. Burns et al
as 2:2018cv01682
Defendant:
Officer Burns, City of Kent, WA, Officer Cortinas and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Morris Kretzer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kretzer v. UHaul Corporation
as 2:2018cv01681
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Morris Kretzer
Defendant:
UHaul Corporation, James Meneghi, Burns and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Constante v. Core Civic/Correctional Corporation of America et al
as 2:2018cv02647
Defendant:
J Guilin, Noland Espinda, Unknown Robertson and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Constante
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Constante et al v. Core Civic/Correctional Corporation of America et al
as 2:2018cv02536
Defendant:
J Guilin, Noland Espinda, Unknown Robertson and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Constante and Miti Maugaotega
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
