Cases 11 - 20 of 80
Ramirez v. Kornegay et al
as 3:2020cv00152
Plaintiff:
Maricela Ramirez
Defendant:
State of Oregon, Joshua Kornegay, Addrienne Hughes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Dew et al v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2019cv08082
Plaintiff:
Joyce Dew and Palmer Dew
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
King et al v. Davis
as 3:2019cv07722
Plaintiff:
Breanna Raymundo and Travis Scott King
Defendant:
Ronald Davis, Demichael Dews, Calvin Nee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dew et al v. City of Seaside et al
as 5:2019cv06009
Defendant:
Manuel Fernandez, City of Seaside, DOES DOES 1 through 100, inclusive and others
Plaintiff:
G. V., Estate of Brandon Virtue, Lori Dew and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Torres v. County of Columbia et al
as 3:2019cv01223
Defendant:
Columbia County, Ryan Dews, County of Columbia and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Rudy Torres
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dew et al v. American Airlines, Inc.
as 3:2019cv03257
Plaintiff:
Jillian Dew and William Dew
Defendant:
American Airlines, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wells v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 3:2019cv02400
Defendant:
Zackary Eaton, Kenneth Eifert, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and others
Plaintiff:
Samuel Wells
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dew v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2019cv01873
Plaintiff:
John Dew
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv01477
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bartlett v. Columbia County et al
as 3:2018cv00807
Plaintiff:
Christopher Bartlett
Defendant:
Columbia County, Ryan Dews, Jeffrey M. Dickerson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
