Cases 11 - 20 of 20
E.M. v. Roman Catholic Archbishop of Agana et al
as 1:2019cv00023
Defendant:
Vernon T. Kamiaz, The Province of St. Mary of the Capuchin Order, John Does 1 through 20 and others
Plaintiff:
EM and E.M.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
M.B. v. Roman Catholic Archbishop of Agana et al
as 1:2019cv00013
Defendant:
Roman Catholic Archbishop of Agana, John Does 1 through 20, Bishop of Guam and others
Plaintiff:
M.B.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Soderlind v. Haigh et al
as 2:2015cv01655
Plaintiff:
Guy Robert Soderlind, Jr.
Defendant:
Ursula J. Haigh , Terence S. Haigh , Christine Annette Barton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-55923
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Booth v. Davis et al
as 3:2012cv03049
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Booth
Defendant:
Davis, Daniel Paramo, Corona and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00395
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Peter Harrell v. Southern Oregon University, et al
as 10-35549
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PETER T. HARRELL
Defendant - Appellee:
SOUTHERN OREGON UNIVERSITY, MARY CULLINAN, CASEY CLITHERO and others
Peter Harrell v. Southern Oregon University, et al
as 09-35992
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PETER T. HARRELL
Defendant - Appellee:
SOUTHERN OREGON UNIVERSITY, MARY CULLINAN, CASEY CLITHERO and others
Patty Lovaas, et al v. Bureau of Land Management, et al
as 08-36068
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PATTY LOVAAS and ELKHORN HOT SPRINGS, INC.
Defendant - Appellee:
BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, TIM BOZORTH, Field Manager and others
Harrell v. Southern Oregon University et al
as 1:2008cv03037
Plaintiff:
Peter T. Harrell
Defendant:
Southern Oregon University, Mary Cullinan, Casey Clithero and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
