Cases 11 - 20 of 40
Isaacson et al v. Brnovich et al
as 2:2021cv01417
Plaintiff:
Paul A Isaacson, Eric M Reuss, National Council of Jewish Women (Arizona Section) Incorporated and others
Defendant:
Mark Brnovich, Michael Whiting, Brian McIntyre and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Sharing Down Syndrome Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Phillip Brooks v. City of Palm Springs et al
as 5:2021cv00754
Defendant:
Officer S. Sandoval, Officer Gonzalez, Officer Jacob Valdivia (#16144) and others
Plaintiff:
Phillip Brooks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White v. Garrett et al
as 3:2021cv00010
Petitioner:
Jimmy Michael White
Respondent:
Nevada Attorney General and Tim Garrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Amazon.com Inc et al v. White et al
as 2:2020cv01773
Defendant:
Michael White, Karen White, Does 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
Amazon.com Inc and Yeti Coolers LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
White v. GlaxoSmithKline LLC et al
as 3:2020cv03954
Plaintiff:
Michael White
Defendant:
Safeway, Inc., GlaxoSmithKline LLC, Sanofi US Services Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Baker v. Prescott, City of et al
as 3:2018cv08324
Defendant:
Prescott, City of, Harvey Skoog, Jodi Rooney and others
Plaintiff:
Tracy Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White v. Tsai
as 4:2018cv00435
Plaintiff:
Michael White
Defendant:
Brian Tsai
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael White v. Danaher Corporation, et al
as 18-55891
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL WHITE
Defendant - Appellee:
THE SENIOR LEADERS SEVERANCE PAY PLAN OF DANAHER CORPORATION and DANAHER CORPORATION
Abel Contreras et al v. XPO Cartage, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv05725
Plaintiff:
Abimael Hernandez, Jose F. Castro, Manuel D. Martinez Mejia and others
Defendant:
XPO Port Services, Inc., XPO Logistics, Inc., XPO Logistics Port Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Michael White v. LASD et al
as 2:2018cv01848
Defendant:
Does, Does and LASD
Plaintiff:
Michael White
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
