Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 247
Standifur v. Montana State Hospital et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2023cv00064
Plaintiff: Richard T. Standifur
Defendant: Montana State Hospital, David Colbertson and Dr. Virginia Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allum v. State of Montana et al
as 2:2023cv00061
Plaintiff: Robert L. Allum
Defendant: State of Montana, Montana State Fund and Does 1-100, Inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Northwest Administrators Inc v. Montana State Hospital
as 2:2023cv01213
Plaintiff: Northwest Administrators Inc
Defendant: Montana State Hospital
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Helen Doe, et al v. Thomas Horne, et al
as 23-16030
Plaintiff / Appellee: HELEN DOE, parent and next friend of Jane Doe, JAMES DOE, parent and next friend of Jane Doe, KATE ROE, parent and next friend of Megan Roe and others
Defendant / Appellant: THOMAS C. HORNE, in his official capacity as State Superintendent of Public Instruction
Defendant: LAURA TOENJES, in her official capacity as Superintendent of the Kyrene School District, KYRENE SCHOOL DISTRICT, GREGORY SCHOOL and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: WARREN PETERSEN, Senator, President of the Arizona State Senate and BEN TOMA, Representative, Speaker of the Arizona House of Representatives
Amicus Curiae: MARY I. O'CONNOR, CAROL BROWN, PATRICIA SPRATLEN ETEM, VALERIE McCLAIN, AND JAN PALCHIKOFF, CONCERNED WOMEN FOR AMERICA, AND SAMARITAN'S PURSE, INDEPENDENT COUNCIL ON WOMENS SPORT and others
Helen Doe, et al v. Thomas Horne, et al
as 23-16026
Plaintiff / Appellee: HELEN DOE, parent and next friend of Jane Doe, JAMES DOE, parent and next friend of Jane Doe, KATE ROE, parent and next friend of Megan Roe and others
Defendant: THOMAS C. HORNE, in his official capacity as State Superintendent of Public Instruction, LAURA TOENJES, in her official capacity as Superintendent of the Kyrene School District, KYRENE SCHOOL DISTRICT and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: WARREN PETERSEN, Senator, President of the Arizona State Senate and BEN TOMA, Representative, Speaker of the Arizona House of Representatives
Amicus Curiae: MARY I. O'CONNOR, CAROL BROWN, PATRICIA SPRATLEN ETEM, VALERIE McCLAIN, AND JAN PALCHIKOFF, CONCERNED WOMEN FOR AMERICA, AND SAMARITAN'S PURSE, INDEPENDENT COUNCIL ON WOMENS SPORT and others
Aguado v. Montana State Prison et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00078
Petitioner: Denis F. Aguado
Respondent: Montana State Prison and James Salmonsen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jennings v. Montana State Prison We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2023cv00041
Plaintiff: Jadon Tayte Jennings
Defendant: Montana State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00036
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12102 Americans With Disabilities Act
Arizona, State of et al v. Michael D Lansky LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2023cv00233
Plaintiff: Arizona, State of, Alabama, State of, Arkansas, State of and others
Defendant: Michael D Lansky LLC an Arizona limited liability company doing business as Avid Telecom, Michael D Lansky individually as a Member/Manager/Chief Executive Officer of Michael D Lansky LLC doing business as Avid Telecom and Stacy S Reeves individually as a Manager/Vice President of Michael D Lansky LLC doing business as Avid Telecom
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Friedt v. Salmonsen et al
as 1:2023cv00057
Plaintiff: Dennis Friedt
Defendant: James Salmonsen, Greg Gianforte, Montana State Prison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?