Cases 11 - 20 of 44
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00777
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sumpter v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2018cv03801
Plaintiff:
Jeff Sumpter
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Abdul Mohamed, et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
as 18-16097
Appellant:
STEVEN SIDLER, DANIEL TURNER, HAROLD BROWER and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SHANNON WISE, RONALD GILLETTE, BRANDON FARMER and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Luis Osollo v. Linda Darling-Hammond et al
as 2:2016cv03045
Defendant:
Linda Darling-Hammond, Richard A. Vladovic, Mistie Barela and others
Plaintiff:
Luis Osollo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 18-16097
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Objector - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Mackonochie et al v. Twin Hill Acquisition Company, Inc. et al
as 4:2018cv02761
Plaintiff:
Rosemary Mackonochie , Ruth Holte , Ruthanne Rhone and others
Defendant:
Twin Hill Acquisition Company, Inc. and Tailored Brands, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sumpter Lovelle Porter v. Lancaster State Prison et al
as 2:2018cv00107
Defendant:
Warden Asuncion, CO Cortez, Doctors and others
Plaintiff:
Sumpter Lovelle Porter
USA v. Roosevelt Sumpter
as 17-50085
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ROOSEVELT SUMPTER, AKA T-Dog, AKA Tu Tu
Comminey v. Castelle, et al.
as 1:2017cv00251
Plaintiff:
Walter Comminey
Defendant:
B Castelle and Sumpter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bernstein et al v. Dunlop et al
as 3:2013cv01563
Plaintiff:
John L. Bernstein, Mary Helen Bernstein, Michael A. Leon and others
Defendant:
Janet Dunlop, William A. Dorsey, U.S. Department of Labor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
