Cases 21 - 30 of 582
Avalos v. Marschke et al
as 3:2023cv08152
Plaintiff:
Luis A Avalos
Defendant:
R Marschke, Diane Miller and GEO Group
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gary Grant Hampton, Jr. v. J. Morales et al
as 2:2023cv04296
Plaintiff:
Gary G. Hampton, Jr.
Defendant:
Correctional Officer J. Morales, Correctional Officer J. Ramirez, Correctional Officer Daniel Avalos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lecia Shorter v. USDC-CALA
as 23-70039
Not Classified By Court:
In re: LECIA L. SHORTER, LEROY BACA, GLORIA MOLINA and others
Petitioner:
LECIA L. SHORTER
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01549
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Roosevelt Espinosa et al v. CEVA Freight, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv00659
Plaintiff:
Roosevelt Espinosa, Fidelis Abaekobe, William Aguilar and others
Defendant:
CEVA Freight, LLC and Does 1-10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00097
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00035
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Avalos Gutierrez v. Garland
as 22-1985
Petitioner:
ALVARO E. AVALOS GUTIERREZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Stallworth v. Thomas et al
as 4:2022cv07667
Plaintiff:
Kenny Stallworth
Defendant:
M. Thomas, R. Poodry, T. Flores and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Luis R. Avalos v. Travon Tate et al
as 2:2022cv07848
Plaintiff:
Luis R. Avalos
Defendant:
Travon Tate, Tammy Chism and Does 1 to 10, inclusive
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
