Cases 21 - 30 of 54
David Andrew Francis Van Dyke
as 8:2017mj00191
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
David Andrew Francis Van Dyke (1)
Martinez v. USA
as 3:2016cv03486
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
David Andrew Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
United States of America v. $10,924.00 in U.S. Currency et al
as 3:2015cv02021
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$10,924.00 in U.S. Currency and One 2000 Porsche Boxster, CA License 4KPJ135, VIN WP0CA2988YU625894
Claimant:
David Andrew Perez
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 0881
Dillon v. Maricopa County Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2014cv02190
Plaintiff:
David Andrew Dehaven Dillon
Defendant:
Maricopa County Sheriff's Office and Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gaona et al v. SunTrust Mortgage Incorporated et al
as 2:2014cv00923
Plaintiff:
David Francis Gaona and David Andrew Gaona
Defendant:
SunTrust Mortgage Incorporated , Equifax Information Services LLC , TransUnion LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
United States of America et al v. Williams et al
as 2:2014cv00345
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
David Andrews Williams, Nancie Ann Boccio, Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7403
David Andrew Gaston, et al v. County of San Bernardino, et al
as 5:2014cv00403
Defendant:
County of San Bernardino and Does
Plaintiff:
Christopher Andrew Gaston, David Andrew Gaston, Jackaline Ann Gaston and others
David Andrew Gaston, et al v. County of San Bernardino, et al
as 2:2014cv01552
Defendant:
County of San Bernardino and Does
Plaintiff:
Christopher Andrew Gaston, David Andrew Gaston, Jackaline Ann Gaston and others
Gaston et al v. County of San Bernardino, a public entity et al
as 2:2014cv01518
Defendant:
County of San Bernardino, a public entity and DOES 1 through 20, Jointly and Severally
Plaintiff:
Christopher Andrew Gaston, David Andrew Gaston, Jackaline Ann Gaston and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
