Cases 21 - 30 of 39
Denby et al v. Casa Grande, City of et al
as 2:2017cv00119
Plaintiff:
James W Denby , Elizabeth J Torres and Wilma J Logston
Defendant:
Casa Grande, City of , Pinal, County of , Francisco X Lujan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00526
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Juan v. Regents of the University of California et al
as 4:2016cv04934
Miscellaneou:
United States of America
Plaintiff:
Diana Juan
Defendant:
University of California San Francisco, Stephen Hauser , John Engstrom and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
JP Morgan Chase Bank v. Rahman et al
as 2:2016cv00035
Plaintiff:
JP Morgan Chase Bank
Defendant:
Hosain Rahman and Alicia Engstrom
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Engstrom et al v. Microsoft Corporation
as 2:2015cv00462
Plaintiff:
George E Engstrom and John E Stockwell
Defendant:
Microsoft Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00096
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Adams et al v. The United States of America et al
as 3:2014cv02810
Plaintiff:
Robert Adams , James Anthony , Edward Backes and others
Defendant:
The United States of America and DOES 1 through 100
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Engstrom v. Washington Correction Center
as 3:2014cv05215
Plaintiff:
Dewayne R Engstrom
Defendant:
Washington Correction Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ticketmaster LLC v. Blazing Tickets Inc et al
as 2:2013cv07631
Defendant:
Blazing Tickets Inc, Does, Kristin Engstrom and others
Plaintiff:
Ticketmaster LLC
Cox vs. Randazza, et al.,
as 2:2013cv00297
Defendant:
AOL Inc., APPLE, David S. Aman, OR and others
Plaintiff:
Crystal L Cox
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
