Cases 21 - 30 of 43
Medved v. Medved
as 2:2015cv01289
Plaintiff:
Justin Sloan Medved
Defendant:
Michael Patrick Medved
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Patrick Dolinsky v. Carolyn W. Colvin
as 5:2015cv01350
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
Michael Patrick Dolinsky
Cullen v Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 6:2015cv00517
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Michael Patrick Cullen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 g Review of Commissioner's Final Decision
Duffy v. Nevada Dept. of Corrections
as 2:2015cv00148
Petitioner:
Michael Patrick Duffy
Respondent:
Nevada Dept. of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Medved v. Medved
as 2:2014cv02242
Plaintiff:
Justin Sloan Medved
Defendant:
Michael Patrick Medved
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jocelyn Allen, et al v. The Boeing Company, et al
as 14-80140
Defendant - Petitioner:
THE BOEING COMPANY, a Delaware Corporation
Plaintiff - Respondent:
JOCELYN ALLEN, LAWRENCE J. ALLEN, VIVIAN LYNN ALLEN and others
Defendant:
BOEING COMMERCIAL AIRPLANES, LANDAU ASSOCIATES INC, a Washington Corporation and DOES 1-50, inclusive
Medved v. Medved
as 2:2014cv02076
Plaintiff:
Justin Sloan Medved
Defendant:
Michael Patrick Medved
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Medved v. Medved
as 2:2014cv02005
Plaintiff:
Justin Sloan Medved
Defendant:
Michael Patrick Medved
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allen et al v. The Boeing Company et al
as 2:2014cv00596
Plaintiff:
Jocelyn Allen , Lawrence J Allen , Vivian Lynn Allen and others
Defendant:
The Boeing Company , Boeing Commercial Airplanes , Landau Associates Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Hayes v. CHC Medical et al
as 3:2013cv08272
Plaintiff:
Michael Patrick Hayes
Defendant:
CHC Medical, Arshad Tariq and Paul Bosseler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
