Cases 31 - 40 of 40
Keith LaVoie v. Russell Haynes, et al
as 11-16713
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEITH LAVOIE, a single man
Defendant - Appellee:
RUSSELL HAYNES, a married man and CITY OF MESA, a government entity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00201
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Justin Lavoie v. Steven J Sentman
as 8:2010cv01929
Petitioner:
Justin Lavoie
Respondent:
Steven J Sentman
O'Hines v. Lewis et al
as 3:2009cv00577
Plaintiff:
James Lynn O'Hines
Defendant:
Lewis, Henderson, McEnroe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James Lynn O'Hines v. Tony Lavoi et al
as 2:2009cv01168
Plaintiff:
James Lynn O'Hines
Defendant:
Tony Lavoi, Robbio Gunsella and Roberto Guillermo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
O'Hines v. Ruiz et al
as 3:2008cv01336
Plaintiff:
James Lynn O'Hines
Defendant:
Ruiz, Peter Deddah & Associates Law Firm, Ortiz, - and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
LaVoie v. Mesa Police Department, City of et al
as 2:2008cv00155
Defendant:
Mesa Police Department, City of, Russell Haynes, Mesa, City of and others
Plaintiff:
Keith LaVoie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Klimes et al v. Menu Foods
as 1:2007cv00160
Plaintiff:
Larry Klimes, Larry Klimes, Larry Klimes and others
Defendant:
Menu Foods
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Mannel et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 9:2007cv00037
Plaintiff:
Michael Mannel, Michael Mannel, Michael Mannel and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company and Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Janet Z Giler v. Richard D Lavoie et al
as 2:2007cv00792
Plaintiff:
Janet Z Giler
Defendant:
Richard D Lavoie, Simon and Schuster and Does
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
