Cases 31 - 40 of 116
Johnson et al v. Rush Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00105
Plaintiff:
William Lee Johnson, Joan Johnson and B & N Trucking, Inc.
Defendant:
Pape Trucks, Inc., Cobham PLC, Rush Enterprises, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Richard Johnson v. Unknown
as 5:2018cv02486
Petitioner:
Richard Lee Johnson
Respondent:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnson v. Salmonsen et al
as 4:2018cv00139
Respondent:
James Salmonsen and Attorney General of the State of Montana
Petitioner:
Aleck Lee Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnson v. County of Santa Clara et al
as 5:2018cv06264
Plaintiff:
Andrew Lee Johnson
Defendant:
Deputy Dominguez, Trent Tessler, Matthew Reeves and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mario Johnson v. Jennifer Spivey, et al
as 18-35665
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARIO LEE JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
JENNIFER SPIVEY and MOLLY STRONG
Mario Johnson v. Nowack, et al
as 18-35640
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARIO LEE JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
NOWACK, Lieutenant, Individual and Official Capacity, LINDA HUST, Individual and Official Capacity, GUSHARD, Cpl; Individual and Official Capacity and others
Long et al v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2018cv02183
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Long and Cora Long
Defendant:
Corizon Health Incorporated, Arizona, State of and Christopher Lee Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hughes et al v. Twin Hill Acquisition Company, Inc. et al
as 4:2018cv02762
Plaintiff:
Alexandra Hughes , Amanda Schweickert , Amy Senft Ritter and others
Defendant:
Twin Hill Acquisition Company, Inc. and Tailored Brands, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Willie Johnson v. Colette Peters, et al
as 18-35202
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIE LEE JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
COLETTE PETERS, BRAD CAIN, SUNQUEST and others
Dijonte L. Johnson vs Warden
as 1:2017cv01697
Petitioner:
Dijonte Lee Johnson
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
