Cases 31 - 40 of 85
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00488
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
GCIU-Employer Retirement Fund et al v. Quad Graphics, Inc.
as 2:2016cv00100
Plaintiff:
Board of Trustees of the GCIU-Employer Retirement Fund and GCIU-Employer Retirement Fund
Defendant:
Quad Graphics, Inc.
Quad Graphics, Inc. v. GCIU Employer Retirement Fund
as 2:2015cv07114
Defendant:
GCIU Employer Retirement Fund
Plaintiff:
Quad Graphics, Inc.
Quade v. Arizona Board of Regents et al
as 2:2015cv00610
Plaintiff:
Brent Quade
Defendant:
Arizona Board of Regents , Michael M Crow , Kevin Cook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sabol-Krutz v. Quad Electronics,Inc.
as 2:2015cv00201
Defendant:
Quad Electronics,Inc.
Plaintiff:
Stacey T Sabol-Krutz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Markus Borchert v. Quad Research, Inc. et al
as 8:2014cv01578
Defendant:
Bruce Anderson, Neeloy Bhattacharyya, Does and others
Plaintiff:
Markus Borchert
Assenberg et al v. County of Whitman et al
as 2:2014cv00145
Plaintiff:
Michael Adam Assenberg , Carla Assenberg and David J Armstrong
Defendant:
County of Whitman , Whitman County Sheriffs Department , Brett Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Appsurdity, Inc. v. Campus Quad, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv00202
Plaintiff:
Appsurdity, Inc.
Defendant:
Campus Quad, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44
Harco National Insurance Company v. The Automotive Group, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv02789
Plaintiff:
Harco National Insurance Company
Defendant:
The Automotive Group, Inc., North County Ford, Inc., Universal Underwriters Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tony Roberts v. G. Ramos, et al
as 13-56608
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TONY ROBERTS
Defendant - Appellee:
G. RAMOS, Correctional Officer, in individual capacity, SOT MARANDA, Correctional Sergeant, in individual capacity, D. H. MCALISTER, D-Quad Captain, in individual capacity and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
