Cases 41 - 50 of 169
Boggs v. SVC Gangmember, et al.
as 1:2024cv00126
Plaintiff:
Boggs
Defendant:
SVC Gangmember and AK Gangmember
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00331
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00345
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
BBlock v. Linze et al
as 1:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
William BBlock
Defendant:
Linze, Copeland, Renfro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boggs v. Gilbert, Town of et al
as 2:2023cv02597
Plaintiff:
Brandon Boggs
Defendant:
Gilbert, Town of, Tempe, City of and Mesa, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cetera Financial Group, Inc. v. Larry G. Boggs et al
as 2:2023cv02461
Plaintiff:
Cetera Financial Group, Inc.
Defendant:
Larry G. Boggs and Christopher L. Boggs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Boggs et al v. City of Cut Bank
as 4:2023cv00034
Plaintiff:
Tra Boggs, Dewayne Johnson and Roberta Corby
Defendant:
City of Cut Bank
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kay Dana v. Idaho Department of Corrections, et al
as 23-35047
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KAY LYNN DANA, FKA Larry Dana
Defendant / Appellee:
IDAHO DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JOSH TEWALT, BREE DERRICK and others
Fernandez v. Midwest Station II Incorporated et al
as 2:2023cv00116
Plaintiff:
Gerson Lagos Fernandez
Defendant:
Midwest Station II Incorporated, David Boggs and Unknown Boggs
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
(PS) Chipman v. Nelson et al
as 2:2011cv02770
Plaintiff:
Rickie Chipman- PROSE E-FILER
Defendant:
Marcia F. Nelson, Enloe Medical Center, Joseph M. Matthews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
