Cases 41 - 50 of 228
Michael Channel, Sr. v. Benjamin Marquez, et al
as 19-15983
Defendant:
JOHN COLLINS, LAWRENCE F. WINTHROP, MICHAEL BAKER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL ALLEN CHANNEL, Sr.
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID MONTOYA, PPD Sergean, #6812, BENJAMIN MARQUEZ, Phoenix Police Department (PPD) Officer, #5429, RICHARD FURMAN, PPD Detective, #868 and others
Williams v. Holbrook
as 2:2018cv01807
Respondent:
Donald R Holbrook
Petitioner:
Carlos John Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Carlos Williams v. Donald Holbrook
as 19-70210
Respondent:
DONALD HOLBROOK, Washington State Penitentiary Superintendent
Petitioner:
CARLOS JOHN WILLIAMS
Jumper v. State of Montana et al
as 4:2018cv00108
Plaintiff:
John William Jumper
Defendant:
Cascade County Adult Detention Center, Dan O'Fallon and State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wallace v. US Government
as 4:2018cv05091
Plaintiff:
John William Wallace
Defendant:
US Government
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2018cv01529
Plaintiff:
John William Martin, Jr.
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rice et al v. Ambrocio et al
as 3:2018cv00875
Defendant:
Gina Linda Ambrocio, Carl G. Anderson, John William Anderson and others
Plaintiff:
Monika Gartner and Norman Alan Rice
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Deachman v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 2:2018cv00393
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
John William Deachman, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
John William Babakitis v. Nancy A. Berryhill
as 5:2018cv00058
Plaintiff:
John William Babakitis
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
USA v. John Lieba, II
as 17-30155
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOHN WILLIAM LIEBA II
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
