Cases 41 - 50 of 52
Lusk v. Bank of America, NA
as 2:2010cv03413
Plaintiff:
Cal Lusk
Defendant:
Bank of America, NA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lusk v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 3:2010cv01356
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Kristina M. Lusk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Lusk v. United States of America
as 3:2010cv00204
Plaintiff:
Harry Curtis Lusk
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Loges v. City of Prosser et al
as 2:2009cv05079
Plaintiff:
Larry Loges and Larry Loges
Defendant:
City of Prosser, Linda Lusk, Fred Stouder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv05245
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
John Lusk et al v. A.B. Boyd Co. et al
as 2:2008cv07548
Plaintiff:
John Lusk, John Lusk, John Lusk and others
Defendant:
A.B. Boyd Co., A. O. Smith Corporation, National Steel and Shipbuilding Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Asbestos Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008at00538
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv01400
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
McCall-Lusk v. Astrue
as 4:2008cv00324
Plaintiff:
Brande McCall-Lusk
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Camarillo Unified et al v. California State Board of Education et al
as 2:2008cv02650
Plaintiff:
Camarillo Unified, Camarillo Unified, Camarillo Unified and others
Defendant:
California State Board of Education, Theodore R Mitchell, Kenneth Noonan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
