Cases 41 - 50 of 2,936
Roy v. Romano et al
as 5:2024cv01281
Plaintiff:
Anand Roy
Defendant:
Pasquale Romano, Rex S. Jackson, Rick Wilmer and others
Tijerina v. State of Idaho, et al.
as 1:2024cv00093
Plaintiff:
Jessica-Ann Tijerina
Defendant:
State of Idaho, Jared Smith, Byron Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Joe Hand Promotions Incorporated v. Sand Bar Enterprises LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00436
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions Incorporated
Defendant:
Sand Bar Enterprises LLC doing business as Sand Bar, Valerie Elisa Sutter, Rick Lynn Gaddis and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605 Communications Act of 1934
Warren v. Dollar Tree, Inc., et al.
as 24-1603
Plaintiff:
ALLANNA WARREN
Defendant:
DOLLAR TREE, INC., DOLLAR GENERAL CORPORATION, JEFF DAVIS and others
WheelImage Corp. v. Axial Manufacturing, et al.
as 24-1381
Plaintiff:
WHEELIMAGE CORP.
Defendant:
AXIAL MANUFACTURING, VF ENGINEERING, RICK EMMETT and others
Hunter v. Paterson, et al.
as 24-1291
Plaintiff:
DAVID SAMPSON HUNTER
Defendant:
STATE MEDIA PERPETRATORS, RICK ALFREAD MANDEVILLE, SCOTT JONES and others
Winjum #206078 v. Geisler et al
as 2:2024cv00451
Plaintiff:
Christopher L Winjum
Defendant:
Jane Anne Geisler, Managed Protected Services Incorporated, Rick Kilfoy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Yates v. Romano et al
as 3:2024cv00149
Plaintiff:
Joann C. Yates
Defendant:
Pasquale Romano, Rex S. Jackson, Roxane Bowman and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
(PS) McGee v. State of California et al
as 2:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
Jefferson A. McGee
Defendant:
State of California, The Governor of California, Arnold Schwarzenegger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
