Cases 41 - 50 of 141
Emrit v. Horus Media Limited et al
as 5:2020cv00002
Defendant:
Horus Media Limited, TIDAL and PayPal
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Emrit v. National Football League et al
as 6:2020cv00024
Defendant:
Washington Redskins, Daniel Snyder and National Football League
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Emrit v. National Football League et al
as 1:2020cv00008
Defendant:
Washington Redskins, Daniel Snyder and National Football League
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Emrit v. Horus Music Video Distribution et al
as 6:2020cv00023
Defendant:
TIDAL, Horus Music Video Distribution and PayPal
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Emrit v. Horus Music Video Distribution et al
as 1:2020cv00007
Defendant:
TIDAL, Horus Music Video Distribution and PayPal
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ronald Emrit v. Universal Music Group, et al
as 19-56525
Defendant / Appellee:
RICK ROSS, ESTATE OF SHAKIR STEWART, ISLAND DEF JAM GROUP and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Ronald Emrit v. Universal Music Group, et al
as 19-36089
Defendant / Appellee:
RICK ROSS, ESTATE OF SHAKIR STEWART, ISLAND DEF JAM GROUP and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Emrit v. Universal Music Group, Island et al
as 5:2019cv00009
Defendant:
Universal Music Group, Island, Def Jam Group, Estate of Shakir Stewart and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Emrit v. Universal Music Group et al
as 1:2019cv00670
Defendant:
Estate of Shakir Stewart, Island Def Jam Group, Universal Music Group and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Emrit v. Universal Music Group et al
as 3:2019cv05984
Defendant:
Island Def Jam Group, Universal Music Group, Rick Ross and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
