Cases 41 - 50 of 101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv01381
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Alley et al v. Cooper Vision, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv01646
Plaintiff:
Melodie Alley , Jaquatta Becoats , Laura Brooksbank and others
Defendant:
Cooper Vision, Inc., Alcon Laboratories, Inc., Bausch + Lomb and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Wellever v. Ryan et al
as 2:2015cv00634
Plaintiff:
Gary Wellever
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, GEO Group Incorporated, Amber Norton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wickenkamp v. Steen
as 2:2015cv00330
Defendant:
Fred Steen
Plaintiff:
Mary Wickenkamp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Infanti v. Mandalay Bay Resort and Casino et al
as 2:2014cv00576
Defendant:
Four Seasons Hotel, MGM Mirage, Mandalay Bay Resort and Casino and others
Plaintiff:
Vittorio Infanti
Unknown:
Jason S. Feinstein and GARY STEEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
McKaney v. Central Arizona Detention Center et al
as 2:2014cv00529
Plaintiff:
Dwayne McKaney
Defendant:
Central Arizona Detention Center, Charles Keeton , J O'Steene and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Wilson et al v. Novo Nordisk, Inc.
as 3:2014cv00420
Plaintiff:
Steen Wilson and Eugene Wilson
Defendant:
Novo Nordisk, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Michael McGlothin v. Castro, et al
as 13-17657
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL MCGLOTHIN
Defendant - Appellee:
CASTRO, L.T., STEEN, Sgt. and RN JOSE, Sgt.
Dr. Willie Banks, Sr. v. Governor John Kitzhaber, et al
as 13-36182
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DR. WILLIE BANKS, Sr.
Defendant - Appellee:
GOVERNOR JOHN KITZHABER, OREGON DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, PAROLE BOARD ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW and others
Gregory Steen v. Ron Fraker
as 13-35944
Petitioner - Appellant:
GREGORY EFRIM STEEN
Respondent - Appellee:
RON FRAKER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
