Cases 51 - 60 of 60
Daniel Lajocies v. City of North Las Vegas, et al
as 11-16519
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DANIEL RAY LAJOCIES
Defendant:
CITY OF NORTH LAS VEGAS
Defendant - Appellant:
MARK PARESI, JOSEPH FORTI and BRIDGEDA, Officer
Daniel Ray McKinney v. Michael Martel
as 2:2011cv04593
Respondent:
Michael Martel
Petitioner:
Daniel Ray McKinney
Rodick v. Ryan et al
as 2:2010cv01886
Plaintiff:
Daniel Ray Rodick
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Jim Taylor, Dennis Kendall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Case name not on file
as 5:2010mc80075
Miscellaneou:
Daniel Ray Judd, Daniel Ray Judd, Madelyn-May Carter-Judd and others
Trustee:
State of California/U.S. Department of Commerce or Successor and State of California/U.S. Department of Commerce or Successor
Daniel Ray Coffman v. Kathy Prosper et al
as 2:2009cv01248
Petitioner:
Daniel Ray Coffman
Respondent:
Kathy Prosper and Anthony Del Real
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Licon v. Nooth
as 3:2008cv00809
Petitioner:
Daniel Ray Licon
Respondent:
Mark Nooth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LaJocies v. City Of North Las Vegas et al
as 2:2008cv00606
Plaintiff:
Daniel Ray LaJocies and Daniel Ray LaJocies
Defendant:
City Of North Las Vegas, Mark Paresi, Joseph Forti and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Herman v. David, et al
as 2:2008cv00526
Plaintiff:
Daniel Ray Herman
Defendant:
A. David and R. Pimental
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Reeves v. Menu Foods
as 2:2007cv00634
Plaintiff:
Daniel Ray Reeves and Daniel Ray Reeves
Defendant:
Menu Foods and Menu Foods
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Gutierrez v. Arpaio
as 2:2007cv00326
Plaintiff:
Daniel Ray Gutierrez
Defendant:
Joe Arpaio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
