Cases 51 - 60 of 138
Murphy v. Welhelm et al
as 3:2019cv01733
Defendant:
Hood River City Police Department, Thomas J Welhelm and Hood River County District Attorney Office
Plaintiff:
James Michael Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lietzke v. City of Montgomery et al
as 6:2019cv01459
Defendant:
Kevin Murphy and City of Montgomery
Plaintiff:
Bill Lietzke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Coury v. CBS Corporation et al
as 3:2019cv01277
Defendant:
Fraser's Boiler Service, Inc., Foster Wheeler, LLC, General Electric Company and others
Plaintiff:
Melissa Coury
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Murphy v. Laney
as 6:2019cv01185
Respondent:
Garrett Laney
Petitioner:
Robert Doyle Murphy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Murphy v. Klien et al
as 6:2019cv01124
Defendant:
Secret Service Agents, Homeland Security Agents, Carl Klien and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Robert Murphy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kistner et al v. 3M Company et al
as 3:2019cv00975
Defendant:
Foster Wheeler LLC, Georgia-Pacific Consumer Products LP, Ingersoll-Rand Company and others
Plaintiff:
Judi Kistner and Ronald Kistner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Odom v. Murphy et al
as 6:2019cv00831
Defendant:
Tara Cox and Dr. Murphy
Plaintiff:
Alonzo Odom
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barclay v. Oregon Department of Justice et al
as 6:2019cv00683
Plaintiff:
Peter Barclay
Defendant:
Daniel R. Murphy, Glen D. Baisinger and Oregon Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bauer v. Washburn et al
as 2:2019cv00655
Defendant:
Captain Frazier, Ms. Kelly Rath, Sue Washburn and others
Plaintiff:
Kirk Michael Bauer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Columbia Sportswear North America, Inc. v. Seirus Innovative Accessories, Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv00137
Defendant:
John Doe, 2, John Doe, 3, Seirus Innovative Accessories, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Columbia Sportswear North America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
