Cases 51 - 60 of 1,310
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-35394
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Shaw et al v. United States Postal Service
as 2:2023cv00849
Plaintiff:
Brandon Shaw, Emily Shaw and T. Shaw
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Daniel Dydzak v. Tani Cantil-Sakauye, et al
as 23-15784
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL DAVID DYDZAK
Defendant / Appellee:
TANI CANTIL-SAKAUYE, MIDFIRST BANK, WILLIAM C. CANBY and others
Chennette et al v. Porch.com et al
as 2:2023cv00740
Plaintiff:
Nathan Chennette, Larry Akins, Gary Alger and others
Defendant:
Porch.com, GoSmith Inc, Matthew Ehrlichman and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01908
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)
(SS) Shaw v. Commissioner or Social Security
as 1:2023cv00600
Plaintiff:
Dawn M. Shaw
Defendant:
Commissioner or Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Shaw v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv03049
Plaintiff:
Douglas Shaw
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Gomez-Shaw et al v. White et al
as 2:2023cv00575
Plaintiff:
Raymond Gomez-Shaw and Mary Lou Caballero
Defendant:
Susan White, Unknown White, Janette C Corral and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Spottsville v. Penzone et al
as 2:2023cv00501
Plaintiff:
Darrius Wardnell Spottsville, Jr
Defendant:
Unknown Penzone, Unknown Dodd, Unknown Shaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv01379
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
