Cases 61 - 70 of 895
Wolfelt v. Roe et al
as 3:2023cv05641
Plaintiff:
Gary H Wolfelt
Defendant:
John C Roe, Josh Metcalf and Lewis County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Hardwick v. Marschke et al
as 3:2023cv08268
Plaintiff:
Josh A Hardwick
Defendant:
R Marschke, Diane Miller and GEO Group
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Huskey v. Highberger
as 6:2023cv01029
Petitioner:
Arnold R. Huskey
Respondent:
Josh Highberger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Noa Kanealii Io Pono I Kelii Ua Mau v. Saito et al
as 1:2023cv00276
Plaintiff:
Noa Kanealii Io Pono I Kelii Ua Mau
Defendant:
Tyler C. Saito, Michael Soong, State of Hawaii and others
Pratt v. Tewalt, et al.
as 1:2023cv00312
Plaintiff:
Timothy R. Pratt
Defendant:
Josh Tewalt, Randy Valley, Kasey Holmes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Klineburger v. Constantine et al
as 2:2023cv00958
Plaintiff:
Stephen Eugene Klineburger
Defendant:
Dow Constantine, Rick Ybarra and Josh Baldi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Harper v. Peterson et al
as 5:2023cv02998
Plaintiff:
Derrick D. Harper
Defendant:
Mark Peterson, Mary Knox, Joe Reposa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Victory v. Tewalt, et al.
as 1:2023cv00297
Plaintiff:
Richard Victory
Defendant:
Director IDOC Josh Tewalt, Chad Page, Centurion and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC)Harper v. Peterson et al
as 3:2023cv02998
Plaintiff:
Derrick D. Harper
Defendant:
Mark Peterson, Mary Knox, Joe Reposa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC)Harper v. Peterson et al
as 1:2023cv00894
Plaintiff:
Derrick D. Harper
Defendant:
Mark Peterson, Mary Knox, Joe Reposa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
