Cases 71 - 80 of 106
Joe v. Corizon Health et al
as 3:2017cv08102
Plaintiff:
Chadrick Joe
Defendant:
Corizon Health, Correct Care Solutions, Charles L Ryan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carlisle v. Douglas County et al
as 6:2017cv00837
Defendant:
Steven Blum, Correct Care Solutions, LLC, Douglas County and others
Plaintiff:
Terri Carlisle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Works v. Correct Care Solutions et al
as 4:2017cv00168
Plaintiff:
Deandre Works
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions, Unknown Gorman and Pima County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Meier v. Correct Care Solutions et al
as 3:2017cv05248
Plaintiff:
Billy J Meier
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions, Clark County Sheriff's Office and Physicians Assistant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ramsey v. Schmidt et al
as 3:2017cv08062
Plaintiff:
Jay David Ramsey
Defendant:
Donovan Schmidt, Correct Care Solutions, Charles L Ryan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wickerham v. Ryan et al
as 3:2017cv08047
Plaintiff:
James R Wickerham, II
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, GEO Incorporated, Arizona Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bivens v. Ryan et al
as 2:2017cv00475
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, GEO Group Incorporated, Bernie Rollins and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Bivens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harper v. Correct Care Solutions et al
as 3:2017cv08018
Plaintiff:
Gary Jerome Harper
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions, Lori Schott, Rafael Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sampson v. Correct Care Solutions et al
as 3:2017cv08003
Plaintiff:
Shawn J Sampson
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reed v. Pima County Adult Detention Center et al
as 4:2016cv00785
Plaintiff:
Kevin Harold Reed
Defendant:
Pima County Adult Detention Center, Pima, County of, Pima County Adult Detention Center Medical Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
