Cases 71 - 80 of 123
Williams v. Gage et al
as 2:2014cv00453
Plaintiff:
James Williams
Defendant:
Bruce Gage, The State of Washington, Washington Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charles Ulmschneider v. Los Banos Unified School Distr, et al
as 14-15552
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES E. ULMSCHNEIDER
Defendant - Appellee:
LOS BANOS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, LOS BANOS TEACHER'S ASSOCIATION, DAN MARTIN and others
Barnard et al v. Watson et al
as 2:2014cv00024
Plaintiff:
Katie J Barnard, NB and MS
Defendant:
Mindy Watson , Allison Weidemann , Bob Stiring and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Goins v. Colvin
as 2:2014cv00030
Plaintiff:
Kay Goins
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Goins v. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
as 3:2013cv03074
Plaintiff:
Linda Goins
Defendant:
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gary v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2013cv02535
Plaintiff:
Daniel J Gary
Defendant:
Joseph M Arpaio, Unknown Graham, Unknown Britian and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Antonio Goines v. Charles Ryan, et al
as 13-17044
Petitioner - Appellant:
ANTONIO UNDRELL GOINES
Respondent - Appellee:
CHARLES L. RYAN, Director of the Department of Corrections and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Goins et al v. County of Merced et al
as 1:2013cv01245
Plaintiff:
Diane Goins and Wesley Rentfrow
Defendant:
County of Merced , County of Merced District Attorney and Merle Wayne Hutton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Sex Discrimination
Otter Products LLC v. Jason P Goins et al
as 2:2013cv04943
Defendant:
Does and Jason P Goins
Plaintiff:
Otter Products LLC
Summa et al v. McKesson Corporation et al
as 3:2013cv03097
Plaintiff:
Sylvia J. Summa , Paul Sykes , John L. Tango and others
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation and SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
