Cases 81 - 90 of 9,420
Gonzalez v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00435
Plaintiff:
Daniel Gonzalez
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Auto Negligence
Auzuma Gonzalez v. Garland
as 24-2182
Petitioner:
LUIS RAFAEL AUZUMA GONZALEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cuper Development LLC et al v. City of Cudahy et al
as 2:2024cv02833
Plaintiff:
Cuper Development LLC, Go Cudahy LLC, Davina LLC and others
Defendant:
City of Cudahy, Alfonso Noyola, Elizabeth Alcantar and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Thompson #339388 v. Gonzalez et al
as 3:2024cv08069
Plaintiff:
Lawton Thompson
Defendant:
Tony J Gonzalez, Michael P McGill and Tina Ainley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv02026
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
(PC)Dorsey v. Youngblood et al
as 1:2024cv00383
Plaintiff:
Thomas Dorsey
Defendant:
Donny Youngblood, Kern County Sheriff's Office, John Weigan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hardt v. City of Portland et al
as 3:2024cv00549
Plaintiff:
Dale Everett Hardt
Defendant:
City of Portland, Scott Moede, Elsa Haag and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03047
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Marcelo Hernandez et al v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2024cv02659
Plaintiff:
Marcelo Hernandez and Cristina Lopez
Defendant:
County of Los Angeles, Pedro Pedraza, Manuel Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gonzalez-Alfaro v. Garland
as 24-1896
Petitioner:
FERNANDO GONZALEZ-ALFARO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
