Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Peterson v. Subit et al
as 2:2024cv00697
Defendant:
Frank Freed Subit & Thomas LLP and Michael C Subit
Plaintiff:
David W Peterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Legal Malpractice
Bryan v. State of Washington et al
as 3:2023cv06042
Plaintiff:
Richard Wesley Bryan
Defendant:
Shauna Johnson, Alison H Sonntag, Amber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peterson v. Marschke et al
as 3:2023cv08418
Plaintiff:
Todd W Peterson
Defendant:
R Marschke, Diane Miller and GEO Group
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. 8.76 Acres, more or less situated in Silver Bow County, State of Montana et al
as 2:2022cv00011
Defendant:
Curt Pohl, Opportunity Bank of America, New Direction Trust Company and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America,
United States of America v. 8.76 Acres, more or less situated in Silver Bow County, State of Montana et al
as 2:2022cv00011
Defendant:
Opportunity Bank of America, New Direction Trust Company, 8.76 Acres, more or less situated in Silver Bow County, State of Montana and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 1471 Federal Aviation Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01628
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
(PC) Baker v. Lynch et al
as 2:2019cv02617
Plaintiff:
Timothy Ray Baker
Defendant:
J. Frederick, J Howard, M. Hontz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richard W. Peterson v. Steve Langford
as 2:2017cv04748
Respondent:
Steve Langford
Petitioner:
Richard W. Peterson
Talley v. Sias et al
as 3:2015cv05501
Plaintiff:
Jerome Talley
Defendant:
Ben Sias, David W Peterson, Coreen E Schnepf and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2015cv00156
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
