Cases 1 - 10 of 118
Borden v. DOJ - United States Department of Justice, et al.
as 24-3072
Plaintiff:
RONALD L. BORDEN
Defendant:
DOJ - UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Case #1, MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL, Case #1, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Case #2 and others
Rouse v. Mason County et al
as 3:2024cv05291
Plaintiff:
Rustin Lee Rouse and Rusty Lee Rouse
Defendant:
Mason County, Randy Newell, Kevin Hansen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rouse v. Hansen et al
as 3:2024cv05068
Plaintiff:
Rusty Lee Rouse
Defendant:
Kevin Hansen, David Guidrey, Randy Newell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Borden v. Case #1 et al
as 3:2023ms00016
Plaintiff:
Ronald L. Borden
Defendant:
Case #1, Case #2 and Case #3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Borden v. Case #1 et al
as 3:2023cv00641
Plaintiff:
Ronald L. Borden
Defendant:
Case #1, Case #2, Case #3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv02033
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Borden v. Bau et al
as 3:2023cv00449
Plaintiff:
Richard Borden
Defendant:
Jon Bau, Josh Rau and Jon Rau
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Fhuere
as 3:2023cv00258
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Smith
Defendant:
Corey Fhuere, Katy Coba, A. Kidwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United African-Asian Abilities Club et al v Borden et al
as 3:2023cv00144
Plaintiff:
United African-Asian Abilities Club and Anna Marie Wiggins
Defendant:
Merry J. Borden and Does 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
Bitt v. USA
as 3:2022cv00457
Petitioner:
Borden Bitt
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
