Cases 1 - 10 of 675
C. Finley v. Karen Bass et al
as 2:2024cv03894
Plaintiff:
C. Finley
Defendant:
Karen Bass, Eunisses Hernandez, Paul Krekorian and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dawson v. Hapo Community Credit Union et al
as 2:2024cv00704
Plaintiff:
Paul Dawson
Defendant:
Hapo Community Credit Union and John and Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mullins v. Powers et al
as 2:2024cv00727
Plaintiff:
Matthew Mullins
Defendant:
Samantha Powers, Kent J Dawson, Judge, Joseph Went and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Curtis, et al. v. Inslee, et al.
as 24-1869
Plaintiff:
AILA CURTIS, CIERA AGEE, ALISON ARCHER and others
Defendant:
JAY ROBERT INSLEE, PEACEHEALTH, LIZ DUNNE and others
Terence Dawson v. Martin J. OMalley
as 2:2024cv01799
Plaintiff:
Terence Dawson
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security and Martin J. OMalley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv08025
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Dawson v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2024cv00505
Plaintiff:
Joseph Dawson
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Orcutt v. Dawson County Probation and Parole et al
as 1:2024cv00011
Plaintiff:
Tracy K. Orcutt
Defendant:
Dawson County Probation and Parole and Dawson County Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hollimon v. Citizens Review Board et al
as 2:2024cv00067
Plaintiff:
Brandon J. Hollimon
Defendant:
Citizens Review Board, Judge Kent J. Dawson, Judge Richard F. Boulware and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(PC) Bonilla v. Arnold
as 2:2023cv02637
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla, VEXATIOUS LITIGANT
Defendant:
Stanley Dawson Arnold
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
