Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Jonassen v. Jacquez, et al.
as 24-2334
Plaintiff:
MARTIN JOSEPH JONASSEN
Defendant:
I. JACQUEZ, D. SUH, B. CRAY and others
Jonassen v. Jacquez, et al.
as 24-32
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARTIN JOSEPH JONASSEN
Defendant / Appellee:
I. JACQUEZ, Warden, D. SUH, Chaplain, B. CRAY, Counselor and others
Jonassen et al v. Jacquez et al
as 3:2023cv01010
Plaintiff:
Martin Jonassen and Elizabeth Mary Jonassen
Defendant:
I. Jacquez, D. Suh, B. Cray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clarke v. Romney et al
as 1:2022cv00042
Plaintiff:
William Carol Clarke
Defendant:
Mitt Romney, Tammy Baldwin, John Barrasso and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Holcomb v. Grassley et al
as 3:2021cv01727
Plaintiff:
Duard Holcomb
Defendant:
Dr. Grassley, John Doe, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hood v. Trump et al
as 1:2021cv00442
Petitioner:
Charles D. Hood
Respondent:
Donald John Trump, John Glover Roberts, Jr., Charles Ernest Grassley and others
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9
Fourstar et al v Trump et al
as 2:2019cv01899
Defendant:
Unknown Officials of Designation and Sentence Computation Center (Grand Prairie, Texas), Connie Tonini, Israel Jacquez and others
Plaintiff:
Victor Charles Fourstar, Jr., Bruce John Denny, David Allen McQueen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Windom v. Brady et al
as 5:2019cv02045
Defendant:
Mitch McConnell, Alan C. Nelson, Dick Cheney and others
Plaintiff:
I & O Publishing Co., Neo-Tech Research Writing Center and Cameron O. Windom
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Stewart v. Grassley et al
as 2:2019cv00086
Defendant:
Maggie Hassan, James Lankford, Mike Crapo and others
Plaintiff:
PJ Stewart
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
George Beltran v. USA, et al
as 18-35313
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GEORGE ALBERTO BELTRAN
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, FEDERAL SATELLITE PRISON CAMP AT SHERIDAN and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
