Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Haydon Modglin v. Anthony Hsieh et al
as 2:2022cv00462
Plaintiff:
HAYDON MODGLIN
Defendant:
Anthony Hsieh, Patrick Flanagan, NICOLE CARRILLO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Haydon v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2019cv07740
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Plaintiff:
Jon Haydon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Odgers v. Ryan et al
as 4:2018cv00556
Defendant:
Corizon Health Care, Charles Ryan, Monica Taylor and others
Plaintiff:
Haydon Odgers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv03103
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv02909
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Haydon v. United States of America
as 3:2010cv05193
Petitioner:
Michael Cory Haydon
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Columbus Life Insurance Company v. Reed et al
as 2:2010at00216
Plaintiff:
Columbus Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
Mary S. Reed, The Spidell Insurance Trust, Dated May 30, 1990, Haydon J. Spidell and Ruth C. Spidell Irrevocable Trust, Dated 1989 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Interpleader Action
Columbus Life Insurance Company v. Reed et al
as 2:2010cv00460
Plaintiff:
Columbus Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
Mary S. Reed, Haydon J. Spidell and Ruth C. Spidell Irrevocable Trust, Dated 1989, Anne Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Interpleader Action
Haydon v. Haviland
as 2:2009cv02537
Petitioner:
Hal Haydon
Respondent:
John W. Haviland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Haydon v. Sisto et al
as 2:2007cv01611
Petitioner:
Hal Haydon
Respondent:
D. K. Sisto, Board of Parole Hearings and State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
