Cases 1 - 10 of 406
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Sunwest Management, Inc. et al
as 6:2009cv06056
Intervenor:
Federal National Mortgage Association, Vestin Realty Mortgage II, Inc., Connolly Intervenors and others
Amicus Curiae:
Hawley's Sequim, LLC, Walter Stawinski, Ventas Realty, Limited Partnership and others
Claimant:
Lloyd Enterprises, Inc., Scott C. Nielsen, Smart Park 3 TIC Investors and others
Interested Party:
Grove, Mueller & Swank, P.C., Mountain View ALF Investors, LLC, Thomas F. Biesiadecki and others
Defendant:
J. Wallace Gutzler, Sunwest Management, Inc., Clyde Hamstreet and others
Petitioner:
Jonathan Lee Riches, Milton Obote, Secured TICs and others
Interpleader:
Zions First National Bank
Receiver:
Michael Grassmueck and Maggie Lyons
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Intervenor Defendant:
Harry Geistlinger
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
In Re Dynamic Random Access Memory (DRAM) Antitrust Litigation
as 4:2002md01486
Plaintiff:
Oracle America, Inc., Petro Computer Systems, Inc., Ashley Pritchett and others
Intervenor:
Maurice Shelly, Daniel Anthony Weymouth, Patrick J. Simpson and others
Not Classified By Court:
norman d palmer, Norman D. Palmer, Bryan Marcus and others
Defendant:
Korea Development Bank, Hyundai Heavy Industries, Co., Ltd., NEC Electronics Corporation and others
Petitioner:
Unisys Corporation, JACO Electronics, Inc, All American Semiconductor Inc. and others
Not Yet Classified:
Charter Township of Clinton Police & Fire Retirement System, Chemical Valley Pension Fund of West Virginia, Kimball Electronics Tampa, Inc. FKA Reptron Electronics, Inc. and others
Interested Party:
Celestica Corporation
Special Master:
Charles B. Renfrew
Claimant:
Oak Point Partners, Inc.
Respondent:
Chip-Tech, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Riches v. Trump
as 1:2016cv00028
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
Donald Trump
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Riches v. Daylight Saving Time et al
as 1:2016cv00023
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
Daylight Saving Time
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Riches v. Valentine's Day
as 1:2016cv00017
Defendant:
Valentine's Day
Plaintiff:
Riches and Jonathan Lee Riches
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
George Pappas v. Countrywide Financial Corp et al
as 2:2007cv05295
Defendant:
Martin R. Melone, Edwin Heller, Countrywide Home Loans Inc. and others
Petitioner:
Jonathan Lee Riches, Dr Marshall J Orloff Ira RO FCC as Custodian AllianceBernstein US Focs Blnd, Patrick J Simpson and others
Consolidated Defendant:
Grant Thornton LLP, KPMG LLP, Countrywide Securities Corporation and others
Not Classified By Court:
Byron B Matthews, Jr, SRM Global Limited Fund Partnership, Independent Fiduciary Services, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Arkansas Teacher Retirement System, Fire & Police Pension Association of Colorado, Shelley B. Katzeff, Barry Brahn and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Thomas P DiNapoli and Marsha Steele
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Robert L Garber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kardashian et al v. The Gap Inc et al
as 2:2011cv06568
Plaintiff:
Kim Kardashian and KimsAPrincess Inc
Defendant:
The Gap Inc, Old Navy LLC, Old Navy Apparel LLC and others
Intervenor:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Kramer et al v. City of Lake Oswego
as 3:2012cv00927
Defendant:
City of Lake Oswego
Plaintiff:
Mark Kramer and Todd Prager
Movant:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States of America v. Maricopa, County of et al
as 2:2012cv00981
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Maricopa, County of , Maricopa County Sheriff's Office and Joseph M Arpaio
Movant:
Scott Huminski and Jonathan Lee Riches
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Riches v. Loughner
as 4:2011cv00059
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
Jared Lee Loughner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
