Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Brown v. Marshall et al
as 3:2021cv00057
Plaintiff:
Carl E. Brown
Defendant:
Dean Marshall, Sherrie Daigle and Joseph Schmidt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joseph Schmidt v. Andrew Saul
as 5:2020cv02272
Plaintiff:
Joseph Schmidt
Defendant:
Andrew Saul, Commissioner of Social Security and Andrew Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Schmidt v. The Washington Newspaper Publishing Company, LLC et al
as 3:2020cv00830
Plaintiff:
Joseph Schmidt
Defendant:
Does 1 Through 10, The Washington Newspaper Publishing Company, LLC and The Washington Newspaper Publishing Company, LLC a Delaware Corporation doing business as Washington Examiner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Schmidt et al v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2017cv01296
Plaintiff:
Joseph Schmidt and Patricia Schmidt
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Merrill v. Schmidt et al
as 3:2014cv00169
Plaintiff:
Stephen Merrill
Defendant:
Joseph Schmidt , Deborah Miller and Kenneth Noland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jesse Lockuk v. Joe Driver, et al
as 14-35309
Petitioner - Appellant:
JESSE PATRICK LOCKUK
Respondent - Appellee:
JOE DRIVER, H.C.F. Warden and JOSEPH SCHMIDT, Commissioner, Department of Corrections
Miller v. Schmidt et al
as 3:2014cv00061
Plaintiff:
Richard I Miller
Defendant:
Joseph Schmidt , Garland Armstrong, Robert Hibpshman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McLellan v. Schmidt et al
as 3:2014cv00032
Plaintiff:
Randall McLellan
Defendant:
Joseph Schmidt and Bryan Brandenburg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Esguerra v. Schmidt
as 3:2013cv00087
Petitioner:
Fred Esguerra
Respondent:
Joseph Schmidt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Helveston v. Schmidt
as 3:2013cv00045
Petitioner:
Ray C. Helveston
Respondent:
Joseph Schmidt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
