Cases 1 - 10 of 796
Winters v. F-N-F Construction et al
as 2:2024cv00880
Plaintiff:
Tanya Winters
Defendant:
F-N-F Construction, Zurich Insurance Company, Katie Hobbs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Atkeson et al v. Belfor USA Group Inc.
as 3:2024cv00932
Plaintiff:
Katie Atkeson and Greg Atkeson
Defendant:
Belfor USA Group Inc. a Colorado corporation doing business as Belfor Property Restoration
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Winters v. Arizona Department of Economic Security et al
as 2:2024cv00878
Plaintiff:
Tanya Winters
Defendant:
Arizona Department of Economic Security, Katie Hobbs and Bradley D Beauchamp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Zamora #141929 v. NaphCare et al
as 2:2024cv01360
Plaintiff:
Eric Castorena Zamora
Defendant:
NaphCare, Ryan Thornell and Katie Hobbs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00802
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Mitchell v. Fraker et al
as 3:2024cv00153
Plaintiff:
Deangelo Lamont Mitchell
Defendant:
Katie Fraker and Nathanjah Breitenbach
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00720
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Cherry #310089 v. Penzone et al
as 2:2024cv00729
Plaintiff:
LaQuint Cherry and Laquint Henry Lee Cherry
Defendant:
Paul Penzone and Katie Hobbs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02001
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Zamora #141929 v. NaphCare et al
as 2:2024cv00761
Plaintiff:
Eric C Zamora
Defendant:
NaphCare, Ryan Thornell and Katie Hobbs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
