Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Soleto v. AWP Gaming LLC et al
as 2:2026cv05208
Defendant:
AWP Gaming LLC, Christopher Michael Maxon, Selena Tellez and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Taylor Kubrick Soleto
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv07705
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv02607
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Vasquez et al v. General Motors LLC
as 5:2026cv04126
Plaintiff:
Pedro Josue Vasquez and Laura D. Rocha
Defendant:
General Motors LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv07598
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Hankins v. United States District Court for the Northern District of California, San Francisco
as 26-4692
Petitioner:
ADRIENNE HANKINS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO
Real Party In Interest:
DENTONS US, LLP, ASHLEY COKER, an individual, KATHARINE E. MELLON, an individual and others
Forooghieh v. Streimer, et al.
as 26-4682
Plaintiff:
ALI FOROOGHIEH
Defendant:
LAURA STREIMER, Commissioner, PARIS SHICK and SHARON BABAKHAN
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv00558
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Howard v. Unique Vacations Inc., et al
as 3:2026cv04145
Plaintiff:
Laura Howard
Defendant:
Johnson Outdoors Diving LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 nr Diversity-Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-4592
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
