Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Allen v. Nollan et al
as 3:2026cv00683
Plaintiff:
Cameron Allen
Defendant:
Nathan Nollan, Megan Madrigan and Churchill County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pattison v. Tolotti, et al.
as 26-5600
Plaintiff:
DANTE PATTISON
Defendant:
TOLOTTI, CRYSTAL PADILLA, ELAIN and others
Nielsen v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2026cv00556
Plaintiff:
Megan Clair Nielsen
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Ellis v. RX Pros LLC et al
as 8:2026cv02292
Plaintiff:
Megan Ellis
Defendant:
RX Pros LLC and DOES 1-10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Schnell v. Luxottica of America Inc. et al
as 3:2026cv04692
Plaintiff:
Megan Leigh Schnell
Defendant:
Luxottica of America Inc. and Does 1 through 50
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 lr Diversity - Labor
Wells v. Daniels et al
as 4:2026cv00404
Plaintiff:
Travis J Wells, Sr.
Defendant:
Mark Daniels, Unknown Bradshaw, Unknown Monge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Prokorym v. Meta Platforms, Inc. et al
as 4:2026cv08033
Plaintiff:
Megan Prokorym
Defendant:
Meta Platforms, Inc., Instagram, LLC, ByteDance Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv05844
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Perez v. Williams
as 3:2026cv00573
Plaintiff:
Joseph Perez
Defendant:
Kenneth Williams, Christy Coss, Megan Sullivan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spier v. Rayfield et al
as 3:2026cv01441
Plaintiff:
Eric S. Spier
Defendant:
AG Dan Rayfield, CDDA Aaron D. Felton, Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
