Cases 1 - 10 of 41
Ciria, et al. v. City and County of San Francisco, et al.
as 24-1847
Plaintiff:
PEDRO CIRIA and YOJANA PAIZ
Defendant:
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ARTHUR GERRANS, JAMES CROWLEY and others
USA v. Approx. $6,700.00 in U.S. Currency
as 2:2024mc00012
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Approximately $6,700.00 in U.S. Currency
Claimant:
Daniel Paiz
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
Anayancy Paiz et al v. 800-Flowers, Inc.
as 2:2023cv07441
Plaintiff:
Anayancy Paiz, Susan Finkbeiner, Larissa Rapadas and others
Defendant:
800-Flowers, Inc. doing business as 1-800-Flowers.com doing business as Harry & David doing business as Personalization Mall doing business as Shari's Berries doing business as 1-800-Baskets.com doing business as Simply Chocolate doing business as Fr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Ciria et al v. City and County of San Francisco et al
as 3:2023cv02796
Plaintiff:
PEDRO CIRIA and YOJANA PAIZ
Defendant:
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Arthur Gerrans, James Crowley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Damon Tate v. 800-Flowers, Inc.
as 2:2023cv04340
Plaintiff:
Damon Tate, Alba Vargas, Natasha Paracha and others
Defendant:
800-Flowers, Inc. and 800-Flowers, Inc. doing business as 1-800- Flowers.com doing business as Harry and David doing business as Personalization Mall doing business as Sharis Berries doing business as 1-800-Baskets.com doing business as Simply Chocolate doing business as
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02887
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
C.P. v. Costco Wholesale Corporation et al
as 5:2022cv01858
Petitioner:
Celina Paiz, Henry Paiz and COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION;
Plaintiff:
C. P.
Defendant:
Costco Wholesale Corporation and Does 1 to 10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Personal Injury
Ramos-Paez, et al. v. Garland
as 22-1153
Petitioner:
INMER ANIBAL RAMOS-PAIZ and JULIO CESAR RAMOS-RUANO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Mary Amador, et al v. Leroy Baca, et al
as 20-56278
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MYESHIA WILLIAMS, DIANE VIGIL, DIANA PAIZ and others
Defendant / Appellee:
LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, a California public entity, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, a governmental entity, LEROY D. BACA, Sheriff, in his official capacity and others
Appellant:
LECIA L. SHORTER
Mary Amador, et al v. Leroy Baca, et al
as 20-55965
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MYESHIA WILLIAMS, DIANE VIGIL, DIANA PAIZ and others
Defendant / Appellee:
LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, a California public entity, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, a governmental entity, LEROY D. BACA, Sheriff, in his official capacity and others
Appellant:
LECIA L. SHORTER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
