Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Matthew Jones et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2022cv04958
Plaintiff:
Matthew Jones, Micheal Jones, Sarah Jones and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Adam Fodrey v. City of Rialto, et al
as 20-55474
Defendant / Appellee:
RORY SCALF, ROBERT MUNGUIA, JOHNNY PATRIDA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ADAM FODREY
Defendant:
DOES
Adam Fodrey v. City of Rialto et al
as 5:2018cv02434
Defendant:
Robert Munguia, Jacob Medina, Rory Scalf and others
Plaintiff:
Adam Fodrey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gonzalez et al v. Health-Ade LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
as 5:2018cv01836
Plaintiff:
Lynette Gonzalez , Michaela Furdzova , Lucas Mariscal and others
Defendant:
Health-Ade LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gonzalez et al v. Health-Ade LLC
as 3:2018cv01836
Plaintiff:
James Coffin, Patrick Rojas, Lucas Mariscal and others
Defendant:
Health-Ade LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and Health-Ade LLC
Interested Party:
Gabriela Bayol and Bruce Verbeck
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Scalf v. Colvin
as 3:2016cv05774
Plaintiff:
Phoebe J Scalf
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Scalf v. Classic Alaska Trading/Big Ray's Alaska, Inc.
as 4:2016cv00014
Plaintiff:
Catherine Scalf
Defendant:
Classic Alaska Trading/Big Ray's Alaska, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Scalf v. Colvin
as 3:2015cv05172
Plaintiff:
Phoebe Scalf
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Brown v. Gipson et al
as 1:2013cv02084
Plaintiff:
William E. Brown
Defendant:
Connie Gipson, J. D. Wilson, A. Guzman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scalf v. Scalf
as 2:2011cv01323
Respondent:
Gretchen I Scalf
Petitioner:
Daniel B Scalf
Counter_claimant:
Gretchen I Scalf
Counter_defendant:
Gretchen I Scalf
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
