Cases 31 - 40 of 43
McGraw v. Sims et al
as 5:2010cv00373
Plaintiff:
Ramon Hosea McGraw
Defendant:
Berry Sims, Kent Krouse, Gary Arnold and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv01959
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Brown v. Arkansas Department of Correction et al
as 5:2010cv00326
Plaintiff:
Daniel Ray Brown
Defendant:
Arkansas Department of Correction, Ray Hobbs, Roger Cameron and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Krug et al v. XTO Energy Inc
as 1:2010cv00069
Plaintiff:
Kent Krug , Karen Krug and Fayetteville Royalty, LLC
Defendant:
XTO Energy Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kent v. Automobile Insurance Company of Hartford Connecticut
as 3:2010cv00183
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Kent
Defendant:
Automobile Insurance Company of Hartford Connecticut
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Kent et al v. Wyeth LLC et al
as 4:2010cv00387
Plaintiff:
Carol Louise Kent and William Kent
Defendant:
Wyeth LLC, Wyeth Pharmaceuticals Inc, ESI Lederle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jarrard v. Kent Investment Corporation
as 1:2010cv00016
Plaintiff:
David Jarrard
Defendant:
Kent Investment Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Bennett et al v. Bryant Arkansas Planning Commission et al
as 4:2009cv00315
Plaintiff:
David Bennett, Christine Bennett, Freddie Marsh and others
Defendant:
Bryant Arkansas Planning Commission, Lance Penfield, Michael Sebren and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Darling v. Outlaw
as 2:2008cv00165
Plaintiff:
Kent Peter Darling
Defendant:
Outlaw
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Eshleman et al v. Wyeth Inc et al
as 4:2008cv01814
Defendant:
Wyeth Inc, Wyeth Inc, Wyeth Pharmaceuticals Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Suzann Eshleman, Suzann Eshleman, Kent Hubbell and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
