Cases 41 - 50 of 474
Harmon v. Noel-Emsweller et al
as 4:2022cv00629
Plaintiff:
Henry A Harmon
Defendant:
Kayla Noel-Emsweller, Dexter Payne, Soloman Graves and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hamner v. Felts et al
as 2:2022cv00137
Plaintiff:
Charles Hamner
Defendant:
John Felts, Arkansas Parole Board, Martha Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frazier v. Guynn et al
as 4:2022cv00691
Plaintiff:
Carlos Ray Frazier
Defendant:
Alex Guynn, William Howard, Gorman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cook v. Daniels et al
as 4:2022cv00577
Plaintiff:
Joe H Cook, III
Defendant:
C Daniels and F Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frazier v. Craig et al
as 4:2022cv00641
Plaintiff:
Carlos Ray Frazier
Defendant:
Craig, Lafeyette Woods, Jr., Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller et al v. Little Rock Police Department et al
as 4:2022cv00574
Plaintiff:
Zion Miller, Jayaeta Miller and Victoria Smith
Defendant:
Little Rock Police Department, Adam Gortney and Patton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Irvin v. Adams et al
as 4:2022cv00476
Plaintiff:
Charlie Irvin
Defendant:
Adams, Baker and Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Catlett et al v. Eck & Glass Inc et al
as 2:2022cv00099
Plaintiff:
Adam Catlett and Josh Bartlett
Defendant:
Eck & Glass Inc and Cummins Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Radford v. King et al
as 4:2022cv00591
Plaintiff:
Tommy Lee Radford
Defendant:
Kiamera M King, Ballon, Quanica Bealer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hudson v. Marbley et al
as 4:2022cv00364
Plaintiff:
Xavier Cortez Hudson
Defendant:
Tina Marbley, CoreCivic West Tennessee Detention and Marrel Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
