Cases 1 - 10 of 73
Glover v. Crawford County Jail et al
as 4:2024cv00571
Defendant:
Crawford County Jail and Kyle White
Plaintiff:
Richard Lane Glover
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crawford v. Norris et al
as 2:2024cv00066
Plaintiff:
Steve Crawford
Defendant:
Kevin E Norris and 10 Roads Express LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Flennoy v. Arkansas Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2024cv00213
Plaintiff:
Jimmie Lee Flennoy
Defendant:
Arkansas Department of Corrections, Woolfolk, Britney Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stinson v. Yates et al
as 2:2024cv00017
Plaintiff:
Mark T Stinson
Defendant:
John P Yates, Blair, Randle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Crawford v. Payne
as 4:2024cv00083
Plaintiff:
Correy Crawford
Defendant:
Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McDiarmid v. Cantrell et al
as 4:2024cv00025
Plaintiff:
Willie Harelton McDiarmid, Jr
Defendant:
Savanna Cantrell, J Crawford and Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stinson v. Yates et al
as 2:2023cv00240
Plaintiff:
Mark T Stinson
Defendant:
John P Yates, Blair, Randle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stewart v. Crawford et al
as 4:2023cv00860
Plaintiff:
Phillip Dewayne Stewart
Defendant:
Katie Crawford, Tamera Deaver and Eric S Higgins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stinson v. Yates et al
as 2:2023cv00091
Plaintiff:
Mark T Stinson, Sr
Defendant:
John P Yates, Blair, Rendon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Crawford v. Lemon et al
as 4:2023cv00106
Plaintiff:
Richard Crawford
Defendant:
Lemon and Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
