Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Burrow v. Gordon et al
as 4:2022cv01114
Plaintiff:
Amie Burrow
Defendant:
Dona Gordon, Marjorie Hall, Bernard Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Williams v. Maxwell et al
as 4:2018cv00042
Plaintiff:
Ambrose Bernard Williams
Defendant:
Julie D Eckert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Baptist Health et al
as 4:2017cv00205
Plaintiff:
Victor Bernard Williams
Defendant:
Baptist Health, Douglas Weeks, Everett Tucker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Hampton v. Arkansas Department of Correction et al
as 1:2016cv00171
Plaintiff:
Stormy Lynn Hampton
Defendant:
Arkansas Department of Correction, Bernard Williams, Dina Powell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Meadows v. Maples et al
as 1:2014cv00114
Plaintiff:
Terese Marie Meadows
Defendant:
John Maples, Jr, Weekly, Aiken and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hassel et al v. Williams et al
as 5:2014cv00217
Plaintiff:
Asrieale Hassel
Defendant:
Bernard Williams, Ray Hobbs, Raymond Naylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sey v. Arkansas Department of Correction et al
as 1:2013cv00022
Plaintiff:
MeLoni Annesta Sey
Defendant:
Arkansas Department of Correction, Corizon Inc, Ray Hobbs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schuler v. White et al
as 1:2013cv00008
Plaintiff:
Edward Dean Schuler
Defendant:
David White, Michelle Williams, Ray Hobbs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murry v. Floyd et al
as 1:2012cv00095
Plaintiff:
Montel Deon Murry
Defendant:
Mary Beth Floyd, Ruth Marie Skrapates, Geraldine G Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edwards v. Kelley et al
as 1:2012cv00044
Plaintiff:
Stephen Edwards
Defendant:
Wendy Kelley, Anderson, Bernard Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
