Civil Rights Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Cases 41 - 50 of 110
BEACH v. CITY OF CARMEL POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2019cv04607
Defendant: CITY OF CARMEL POLICE DEPARTMENT, ADAM THEIS and CITY OF CARMEL
Plaintiff: CHANDLER TWO HUNTER BEACH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv04563
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv04112
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv03795
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv03580
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
THOMPSON v. TOWN OF NASHVILLE, INDIANA et al
as 1:2019cv02958
Defendant: BROWN COUNTY, INDIANA and Town of Nashville, Indiana
Plaintiff: ADAM THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LONG et al v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS et al
as 1:2019cv02603
Defendant: SUSIE CORDI, JOSEPH SIMPSON, ZACH ADAMS and others
Plaintiff: BOBBY RAY LONG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EASTRIDGE v. CLARKSVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 4:2019cv00128
Defendant: CLARK COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, INDIANA STATE POLICE POST 45, MATHEW ADAMS and others
Plaintiff: JAMES DARREN EASTRIDGE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
RAYFORD-BEY v. HAND et al
as 1:2019cv02232
Defendant: ADAM L. HAND and KITCH ACCEPTANCE CORP.
Plaintiff: STACY RAYFORD-BEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01236
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?