Cases 11 - 20 of 24
NOEL v. INDIANA METRO POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2022cv00677
Plaintiff:
JAMES FRANK NOEL, JR. and JAMES F. NOEL, JR.
Defendant:
INDIANA METRO POLICE DEPARTMENT, CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, MARION COUNTY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WOOTEN v. HUGHES et al
as 1:2022cv00545
Plaintiff:
RONALD T. WOOTEN
Defendant:
KENTON HUGHES and PEACE OF MIND PEST CONTROL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
KAPETANIOS v. SHEPHERD et al
as 1:2021cv02843
Plaintiff:
JAMES MICHAEL KAPETANIOS, SR.
Defendant:
JACKSON SHEPHERD, TONY KUMMER, ANDREW PLANK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NOEL v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2020cv03245
Defendant:
MYLA A. ELDRIDGE, FRANKLIN D. WOOTEN, MARION COUNTY and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES F. NOEL, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WOOTEN v. POWELL
as 1:2020cv00356
Plaintiff:
JEFFERY L. WOOTEN
Defendant:
P. POWELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NOEL v. GREEN et al
as 1:2019cv04824
Defendant:
MYLA A. ELDRIDGE, FRANKLIN WOOTEN, KENNETH GREER and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES F. NOEL, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WOOTEN v. LAYTON
as 1:2019cv02626
Plaintiff:
JEFFERY L. WOOTEN
Defendant:
JOHN LAYTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WOOTEN et al v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2018cv02590
Defendant:
COOK MEDICAL LLC, COOK INCORPORATED and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
CHRISTY WOOTEN and DANNY WOOTEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
WOOTEN et al v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2017cv00604
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
MARY WOOTEN and ROBERT WOOTEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396 - Tort Negligence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01500
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
