Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Cases 21 - 30 of 208
SIMS v. VANSCHOYCK et al
as 2:2021cv00230
Defendant: KELLY INDA, SHAKEFER, BENNETH and others
Plaintiff: JOHN SIMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00066
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LAX et al v. SLOAN et al
as 1:2021cv00202
Defendant: NATHAN SLOAN, MELISSA PEASE, DENNIS MURPHY and others
Plaintiff: DOMINIQUE S. LAX and CRYSTAL LAX
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MURPHY v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2021cv00006
Defendant: COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff: NATACHIA MURPHY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TAFT v. SMITH et al
as 2:2020cv00681
Plaintiff: THOMAS TAFT
Defendant: A. BOURLAND, SMITH and MURPHY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HUFF v. SMITH et al
as 2:2020cv00635
Defendant: MORELAND, MURPHY and SMITH
Plaintiff: IAN HUFF
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RICER v. JUUL LABS, INC. et al
as 3:2020cv00253
Defendant: ELIQUITECH, INC., JAMES MONSEES, ALTRIA ENTERPRISES LLC and others
Plaintiff: MASSON RICER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WALTON v. JUUL LABS, INC. et al
as 4:2020cv00197
Defendant: JAMES MONSEES, ALTRIA ENTERPRISES LLC, MOTHER MURPHY'S LABS, INC. and others
Plaintiff: RAIDEN WALTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MURPHY v. LINCOLN et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv00475
Plaintiff: JOSHUA W. MURPHY and HAMZAH WALI ABUU JIHAD
Defendant: M. LINCOLN, JARRY ANDERSEON and K. GILMORE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ANDERS v. JUUL LABS, INC. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv02341
Defendant: ELIQUITECH, INC., JAMES MONSEES, ALTRIA ENTERPRISES, LLC and others
Plaintiff: THOMAS ANDERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?