Cases 31 - 40 of 1,556
VILCHUCK v. BALLENGER et al
as 1:2024cv00141
Plaintiff:
SETH A. VILCHUCK
Defendant:
J. D. BALLENGER, DENNIS REAGLE, RICHARD BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWNING v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2023cv02234
Plaintiff:
KRISTINA L. BROWNING
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI and MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
BROWN v. ROBINSON et al
as 3:2023cv00220
Plaintiff:
GEORGE D. BROWN
Defendant:
NOAH ROBINSON and VANDERBURGH COUNTY GRIEVANCE CONTROL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN et al v. MCCORKLE et al
as 1:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
KEVIN MARTIN
Defendant:
T. MCCORKLE, CONYERS, D. REAGLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WOODY et al v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2023cv02315
Plaintiff:
BRANDON WOODY, ANTHONY WHITE, MARCO WEBSTER and others
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, MAGGIE BRYANT, CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN et al v. VOS
as 3:2023cv00222
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH N. BROWN and CODEY RITCHISON
Defendant:
L. VOS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. GALE et al
as 1:2023cv02131
Plaintiff:
CORY DAVID BROWN
Defendant:
GALE, MAVES, COREY VALDEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BANKHEAD v. ERNEST et al
as 1:2023cv02268
Plaintiff:
ACTORA MECONN BANKHEAD
Defendant:
J. ERNEST, J. JACKSON and BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ARMSTEAD v. BROWN et al
as 1:2023cv02079
Plaintiff:
MARCUS A. ARMSTEAD
Defendant:
BROWN, SUMMERS, SOLOMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BANKHEAD v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2023cv02267
Plaintiff:
ACTORA MECONN BANKHEAD
Defendant:
D. REAGLE, J. ERNEST, J. JACKSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
