Cases 41 - 50 of 196
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv03524
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00136
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
WILSON v. INDIANA COURT OF APPEALS et al
as 2:2019cv00328
Defendant:
INDIANA COURT OF CUSTOMS AND PATENT, INDIANA COURT OF LAW and INDIANA COURT OF APPEALS
Plaintiff:
JAMES WILSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
YOUNG v. KNOX COUNTY LAW ENFORCEMENT CENTER
as 2:2019cv00275
Plaintiff:
MARION L. YOUNG
Defendant:
KNOX COUNTY LAW ENFORCEMENT CENTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THE BAR PLAN MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. MOYER LAW FIRM, P.C. et al
as 1:2019cv02310
Defendant:
KEVIN L. MOYER, MOYER LAW FIRM, P.C. and NANCY LEMEN
Plaintiff:
THE BAR PLAN MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GARRIGUS v. CODILIS LAW, LLC. et al
as 1:2019cv01999
Defendant:
FAY SERVICING, LLC, CODILIS LAW, LLC, U.S. BANK TRUST NATIONAL ASSOCIATION and others
Plaintiff:
TERRI GARRIGUS and TERRI L. GARRIGUS
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
SAVAGE v. HENDRICK COUNTY JAIL et al
as 1:2019cv01965
Plaintiff:
BRANDON CELM JOSEPH SAVAGE
Defendant:
HENDRICK COUNTY JAIL, DANIEL MAXWELL, JOSEPH LAW and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv04087
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
PATEL v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION et al
as 1:2018cv03442
Defendant:
EMORY UNIVERSITY, BROWNSBURG COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORP., INDIANAPOLIS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Plaintiff:
RAJ PATEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. NATIONAL CREDIT SYSTEMS INC. et al
as 3:2018cv00213
Defendant:
LAW OFFICE OF BRETT M. BORLAND, P.C. and NATIONAL CREDIT SYSTEMS INC.
Plaintiff:
LANAE MATAYA JONES
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
