Cases 51 - 60 of 442
BIRDEN v. LUNSFORD et al
as 1:2023cv00741
Plaintiff:
WESLEY B BIRDEN
Defendant:
LUNSFORD, GILBERT and UNKNOWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
REEDER v. TAYLOR et al
as 1:2023cv00528
Plaintiff:
MARC BEREN REEDER
Defendant:
TASHA TAYLOR, BRETT WITTER, MARK MCCLEESE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
RHYME v. POLLEY et al
as 1:2023cv00469
Plaintiff:
DARRELL RHYME
Defendant:
NICULY POLLEY, KAITLIN JACKOWICZ, UNKNOWN DEFENDANTS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
DAVIS v. UNKNOWN DOCTORS
as 2:2023cv00096
Plaintiff:
TYLER DAVIS
Defendant:
UNKNOWN DOCTORS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PERRY v. CONYERS et al
as 1:2023cv00361
Plaintiff:
JASON S. PERRY
Defendant:
CHRISTINA CONYERS, SARA CHICHFIELD, UNKNOWN STAFF MEMBER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRENNER v. ELROD et al
as 3:2023cv00019
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW C. BRENNER
Defendant:
MATTHEW R. ELROD, FARRIS, PHAR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAKE v. CHAO et al
as 1:2023cv00203
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM DAKE
Defendant:
STANLEY CHAO, FIRST LOAN, NP FINANCE, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
BARKER v. CARTER et al
as 1:2023cv00108
Plaintiff:
KENTE BARKER
Defendant:
ROBERT CARTER, JR., TRICIA PRETORTIOUS, STINE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GROTE v. MARION COUNTY JAIL et al
as 1:2022cv02350
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY GROTE
Defendant:
MARION COUNTY JAIL, DOCTOR UNKNOWN, JOHNSON COUNTY JAIL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAVENPORT v. DEWLEN et al
as 2:2022cv00535
Plaintiff:
ERIN KATHLEEN DAVENPORT
Defendant:
LAURA DEWLEN, BETHANY MOLT, JULIE STOUT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
